AUCD LOI #: UCD RTOI 2008-999-01
Developmental Outcome Feasibility Study: Deaf/Hard of Hearing
NECAP: National Early Childhood Assessment Project – D/HH
ABSTRACT
Early hearing detection and intervention programs were designed to assure that all infants born in the United States have access to hearing screening within the first month of life to provide an opportunity for infants with hearing loss to develop age and cognitively appropriate communication skills. There is great urgency to develop systems that can assure that infants with hearing loss are enrolled in appropriate early intervention services before six months of age. The probability of successful development drops from 80% to 35% with later identification of hearing loss and later enrollment in appropriate early intervention services. As with all quality health initiatives, the quality of the intervention is paramount. In order to monitor and assure quality services, ongoing developmental assessment must be conducted. Despite the fact that screening began 16 years ago, and that almost all of the 4 million babies born annually in the United States are being screened for hearing in the first month of life, only one state can provide data that demonstrates the effectiveness of the hearing screening programs. This project will conduct a feasibility study to provide technical assistance to a minimum of 5 states to develop data management systems that are capable of collecting and reporting developmental outcomes of infants/children identified through the hearing screening programs. The project will assist in forging collaborative relationships within states and territories with state health departments, state education departments, educational systems for deaf and hard-of-hearing children, public and private early intervention programs, and parent organizations to help assure the collection and reporting of developmental outcomes of individual infants identified with hearing loss. The project will rely upon the acceptance of a minimum of two standardized developmental assessments that will be used with as many families with identified children as possible. Data about early intervention follow-through, characteristics of the intervention services, demographics of the enrolled population, and developmental outcomes will be analyzed and reported annually by state/territory and across all participating states/territories.
The goal of EHDI programs is to prevent the negative effects of congenital hearing loss upon the communication and social-emotional development of infants/children.
- EHDI programs have been established in 50 states and all territories
- There is a national expectation that all 4 million newborns in the US/territories will be screened for hearing within first few days of life.
- There is a national reporting mechanism and expectation that screening data will be reported.
- There is a national expectation that diagnosis of hearing loss and referral to intervention will be reported
- Compliance for diagnosis of hearing loss is difficult – indicates that from screening referral – follow-through data is only available on 33 of every 100 infants referred for additional testing
- We estimate that only 1 of every 2 infants with hearing loss are currently being tracked from screening referral to early intervention
- There is currently no expectation nationally or within states that developmental outcome data will be collected on every infants/child identified with hearing loss.
- Current systems for assessing developmental outcomes are not compatible with goals of EHDI systems. These systems do not use instruments with normative information about children with typical hearing and no disability, are data collected non-categorically, no information on hearing loss, and provide developmental outcomes for all children with disabilities of a specific age group, do not use consistent assessment tools and therefore, analysis of data within states and across states is not possible.
Specific Aims
The primary aim of this project is to determine the feasibility of establishing systems within states/territories capable of reporting comprehensive developmental outcome data on the infants/children followed from universal newborn hearing screening programs to a national database. The study will quantify and describe successful models for the collection of statewide developmental outcome data on the state’s population of infants/children who are deaf or hard of hearing. In addition, it will characterize the language abilities of children with hearing loss from a national perspective and identify factors that lead to more successful language outcomes.
- Specific Aim 1. A minimum of five states will set a goal of collecting and analyzing developmental outcome data from between 50 to 60% of their state/territory population of infants/children who are deaf or hard of hearing enrolled in early intervention services.
- Colorado
- New Mexico
- Wyoming
- Idaho
- Minnesota
- Wisconsin
- North Carolina
- Arizona
- Utah
- South Carolina
- Louisiana
- Oklahoma
- Indiana
- Specific Aim 2. The project will report system characteristics of each participating state and identify system characteristics that facilitate or prevent the collection of population developmental outcome data. The data from states will provide Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) coordinators with successful model characteristics, assessment protocols, materials, and data fields.
- Specific Aim 3. The project will report the developmental outcomes on the Minnesota Child Development Inventory of the total sample for: 1) expressive language, 2) language comprehension, 3) situation comprehension, 4) gross motor, 5) fine motor, 6) self-help, 7) social and 8) general development by demographic variables of the child and family (e.g., chronological age, degree of hearing loss, cognitive development , age of identification, age of intervention, type of intervention, degree of hearing loss, socio-economic status (educational level of the mother/father), ethnicity, multiple disabilities, etiology and gender of the child by state or territory.
- Specific Aim 4. The project will report the developmental outcomes for expressive vocabulary, receptive vocabulary, symbolic gestures, and phrases understood on the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories for the total sample by demographic variables.
- Specific Aim 5. The project will report the developmental outcomes of individual participating states/territories and the relationship of these outcomes to demographic characteristics.
- Specific Aim 6. The project will develop and send out annually, a parent satisfaction survey on intervention services, and a survey of parent and consumer systems involvement, inviting all EHDI and Hands & Voices chapters to participate. Results of the parent satisfaction survey will be analyzed by family characteristics: 1) degree of hearing loss, 2) type of hearing loss – i.e., unilateral/bilateral, 3) provision of intervention with a specialist in hearing loss, 4) age of identification and age of intervention start, 5) multiple disabilities or hearing loss only, 6) state/territory, 7) Hands & Voices chapter participation.
- Specific Aim 7. The project will collect data that will identify for each state/territory, whether a system of parent involvement exists and the characteristics of those parent involvement systems.
- Specific Aim 8. The project will develop and collect information through a questionnaire about early intervention provider skills and knowledge piloting in a few states and then inviting all EHDI and Hands & Voices chapters to participate. The data collected will include provider knowledge about: 1) diagnostic evaluation, 2) amplification, 3) cochlear implant candidacy, 4) auditory skill development, 5) sign language, 6) anticipated outcomes, 5) developmentally appropriate strategies, 6) multiple disabilities,
- Specific Aim 9. The project will develop a questionnaire to report amplification fitting information inviting diagnostic audiologists in any state from Academies of Audiology or Speech and Hearing Associations and parents through Hands & Voices chapters and EHDI coordinators to respond. The project will work with the Colorado EHDI data system and pilot this data collection in a few states.
- Specific Aim 10. The project will develop and collect information from a survey of the intervention program characteristics of the participating states and any states that wish to participate. Programs will be characterized in terms of: 1) public, local, 2) public, state, 3) private, 4) hearing loss specialty, 5) early childhood specialty, 6) communications modes offered, 7) educational training of the providers.
Project Justification
Severe delays in the acquisition of speech and language have been consistently documented in deaf children. These language delays are apparent early in life and are directly related to significant later limitations in reading and writing. The severe limitations that most deaf individuals face when reading, in turn, have a profound impact on their ability to learn during the school years and throughout their life.
Universal newborn hearing screening has increased dramatically the number of infants identified with hearing loss within the first few months of life and has reduced the age at which intervention services are initiated. This provides an excellent opportunity to raise the language levels of children who are deaf or hard of hearing, potentially closing the gap between children with hearing loss and their hearing peers by the time of school entry.
A data-driven approach to early intervention will assist in achieving the goal of maximizing the language abilities of children with hearing loss. This is accomplished through regular and consistent assessment of all children within an intervention program. The aggregate results of this assessment can be used to evaluate the intervention program as a whole, guide program development, and inform professional preparation needs. The results for individual children allow parents and interventionists to monitor a child’s progress over time and identify potential delays at their onset. Additionally, results from the assessment data can be used to generate IFSP/IEP goals and to provide a data-driven approach to educational programming decisions.
The use of a standard, nationwide assessment battery, provides significant benefits to the field of deafness in addition to the general benefits of regular assessment described above. By using a common set of assessment tools, states can contribute to a national outcomes database that will provide much-needed data on the progress of a large group of young children who are deaf or hard of hearing with varying characteristics. This database will allow us to characterize the language strengths and weaknesses of children with hearing loss and identify factors that are predictive of more successful language outcomes. The identification of key variables that lead to better (or poorer) outcomes for young deaf and hard-of-hearing children will allow early intervention and preschool programs to identify children that may be at risk for significant delays in speech and/or language. In addition, it will assist intervention and educational programs in designing curriculums that will maximize the success of all deaf and hard-of-hearing children.
Eligible Participants
All children with permanent hearing loss are eligible to participate. Children whose loss is not permanent (e.g., cases where the hearing loss is solely a result of otitis media) are not eligible. Eligible children may have:
- Unilateral or bilateral loss
- Conductive, senori-neural, or mixed hearing loss
- Any degree of permanent hearing loss from mild to profound
- Multiple disabilities or hearing loss only
- English or Spanish as the language of the home
Testing Schedule
Individual programs may determine the testing schedule for their children based on when they feel the developmental information would be of most value. The instruments included in the test battery are valid and reliable for children from 14 months to 4 years of age. Testing is recommended at 6 to 12 month intervals in order to monitor progress and inform intervention. Completed questionnaires should be sent to the university one full month before the results are needed to allow time for mailing, scoring, and report writing.
If a program does not have a specific preference regarding the testing schedule, the following test ages (plus or minus one month) are recommended:
- 15 months
- 24 months
- 33 months (to provide information in time for transition to Part B)
- 4 years (if the child is still enrolled in the program)
Testing Procedure
At each assessment, parents will complete several developmental questionnaires regarding their child’s language and general developmental skills. These questionnaires are described in more detail in the section below. Completion of the questionnaires requires approximately 1 to 2 hours of the parent’s time. Typically, the questionnaires are given to the family by their interventionist at a regularly scheduled visit. The interventionist reviews the instructions for completing the questionnaires with the family and answers any questions they might have. They inform the family that they will collect the completed questionnaires at the next scheduled visit.
When the interventionist retrieves the questionnaires from the family, it is critical that they review all of the forms for completeness and accuracy. Incomplete forms can not be scored, and inaccurately completed forms are of no value to the family, provider, or national database. If the interventionist disagrees with the family’s assessment of the child’s abilities, this is an excellent clinical opportunity to provide education to the family about observation of their child’s skills. The interventionist, preferably with input from the family, should complete any missing items and make corrections to the responses as needed.
Completed assessment protocols should be sent to Dr. Allison Sedey at the University of Colorado at Boulder for scoring and input into the national outcomes database. Dr. Sedey will generate a report of the results and return these to the child’s early intervention provider. It is the responsibility of the interventionist to share the report with the family and/or other professionals as determined by each individual program. Results from the report can be used to identify potential delays and track individual children’s progress over time. It may also be useful to the provider in establishing goals and/or making other programming decisions.
Cost and Benefits
The cost for this service will be $50 per child per assessment packet. If a provider chooses to complete the Play Assessment Questionnaire in addition to the standard set of protocols, the total cost will be $95 per assessment.
The fee for the assessment includes the following services:
- Scoring of all questionnaires
- A written report sent to the interventionist detailing the results of the testing
- A profile sheet based on the results of the Minnesota Child Development Inventory graphically displaying the child’s areas of strengths and weaknesses relative to their chronological age
- A summary sheet detailing the raw scores and age scores obtained on the MacArthur Communicative Inventory
- An annual accountability report summarizing the language and developmental outcomes of children within the state. This information can be disaggregated based on key demographic characteristics (e.g., presence of additional disabilities, degree of hearing loss, etc.) on request.
- Participation in the establishment of a national database to track outcomes for young children who are deaf or hard of hearing
Description of Questionnaires
Minnesota Child Development Inventory: This instrument assesses the child’s development in nine domains. They are: social, self help, gross motor, fine motor, expressive language, language comprehension, letters, numbers, and situational comprehension. Parents circle “yes” or “no” to a series of statements describing different skills. Developmental age scores are derived for each of the subscales. These are plotted on a profile graph relative to the child’s chronological age so that areas of strength and weakness can be seen easily.
MacArthur Communicative Inventories: There are three inventories in this series. Only one is completed at a given age based on the child’s estimated vocabulary size. All three of the inventories assess a child’s use of vocabulary. Parents check off words that their child produces in speech and/or sign. Depending on the inventory selected, additional skills may be measured
including vocabulary comprehension, grammar, and cognitive-linguistic abilities. For each area that is assessed an age score is calculated and presented on a single summary sheet.
- Demographic Information Form: This form is used to obtain information about the child’s hearing loss (age of identification, age of onset, etc.), any other disabilities the child may have, the type of communication used with the child (sign language, spoken language only, etc.), and the type and amount of intervention the child receives.
- Audiologic Release Form: This form will be used so that audiologic records can be obtained for each participant from whatever facility they go to for hearing testing. In lieu of this form, interventionists/families may provide a recent unaided audiogram and/or the results of ABR testing.
- Consent form: This form requests the parents’ permission for including their child’s results in the national database.
- Play Assessment Questionnaire: This assessment is optional, and scoring of this protocol increases the cost of the evaluation from $75 to $95. The Play Assessment Questionnaire lists a variety of play and play-related behaviors demonstrated by children from 1 month to 3 years of age. Parents indicate which behaviors they have observed in their child. A developmental age score is calculated based on behaviors a child can do independently as well as a score for what he/she is able to accomplish with adult assistance. These scores are highly correlated with cognitive ability, thus the results of the assessment can give an indication of a child’s non-verbal cognitive level. The items on the questionnaire are arranged in a developmental hierarchy, thus it is often useful to interventionists and parents in identifying symbolic play goals for individual children.
Training
Optional in-service training will be provided on request. The cost of this training is $1,500 for a single day which includes transportation, lodging, food, and trainer stipend. For each additional day of training within the same visit, the cost is $800.
A series of three, one to two day trainings over the course of a year are recommended. These would include:
1. Description of the assessment instruments, instructions for test administration, understanding the assessment results, and logistics for disseminating and completing the assessments
2. Interpreting the results of the assessment and using the results to establish goals, make programming decisions, and guide intervention
3. A follow-up on the training described above after interventionists have had approximately 6 months of experience administering the assessment instruments and receiving the results
|
|